Skip to content
Julia Raciniewska

Outreach

Live

Weekly Backlink Research: 150+ Opportunities Found, Zero Links Won (So Far)

An eight-strategy backlink prospecting task that runs every Monday — and an honest look at the gap between finding opportunities and converting them.

Last updated · Tools: Claude (Cowork) scheduled task, Web search, Gmail (drafts only), Excel tracker

The problem

A small brand's rankings are capped without backlinks, and backlink prospecting is the definition of work that never happens organically: repetitive research, link verification, personalised outreach, and follow-up tracking across six markets (UK plus DE/ES/FR/PT/NL — we only ship to the UK and EU, so a US link is worth little).

The previous manual process

None. This work simply didn't happen.

The AI-assisted workflow

Every Monday at 08:00, a scheduled task works through eight strategies in priority order: broken-link building (highest priority — the task must verify at least five actually-broken links per run via real status checks, not guesses), resource pages, unlinked brand mentions, competitor link gaps, digital PR opportunities, podcasts and YouTube, professional and partner listings, and guest posts.

Hard limits are encoded: at most six new opportunities per strategy per run, exactly five outreach emails drafted per week, and every draft must hyperlink the exact article it references — no "I loved your recent post" vagueness. Findings append to a tracker spreadsheet with pipeline, won-links and log tabs; previously won links get re-checked every 21 days to catch removals.

The outreach angle matters: version 1 offered "we'll send you a free pair" editorial framing. Version 2 replaced it with an affiliate-partnership hook modelled on real emails I'd written that got responses — a commercial reason to reply, not a favour to do us.

Human review required

All five weekly outreach emails are Gmail drafts. I review, sometimes rewrite, and send them myself. The automated part is research and drafting; the relationship is mine.

Outcome

Around 150 qualified opportunities logged across eight strategies and six markets. And here is the honest part: the won-links tab is still empty. Some of that is a logging gap (sends and wins are tracked manually and lag behind), but I'm not going to pretend there's a result where I can't verify one. This workflow is currently proof that AI solves the research bottleneck — and that link building's real bottleneck comes after the research.

What failed or remained difficult

The geographic filter had to be made a hard rule after early runs surfaced US-based opportunities we can't service. And the conversion gap above is the real finding: automation compressed the discovery work to near zero, which exposed that discovery was never the constraint. Sending, following up and offering something genuinely valuable is.

What I would change next time

Track sends and responses with the same rigour as opportunities from day one. A pipeline where the automated half is meticulously logged and the human half isn't gives you flattering-but-useless numbers.

Reusable lesson

When automation makes one step of a funnel free, the bottleneck doesn't disappear — it moves. Measure the step after the one you automated.

Resources

The scheduled task behind this workflow is published, sanitised, in the SEAR Plugs optimisation repo; the tracker template will be added there as a blank spreadsheet.

  • weekly-backlink-research — scheduled Mondays 08:00; works through all eight strategies across your home and priority markets, verifies broken links against real status codes, and queues exactly five outreach emails as Gmail drafts for you to review and send.

← All workflows